Forum Risk V8
-
Shojump
League Participant
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:21 pm
-
XxXAtlanXxX
Deuced Up - Posts: 557
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 12:26 am
-
Fleischgeruch
Winter Celebration 2013
- Posts: 961
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:15 pm
-
CommieBuffalo wrote:Attack the northern piece of derpsterI'm only going to say this one more time, aftet that people can complain all they want.
When a coalition fights, wins and losses are divided equally. Therefore you'll conquer on both sides. If you don't like it, shouldn't have split him.
Supprising. Funny. Intidimating.
Cool pastes | Cool pics
http://i.imgur.com/pg3BqWL.png new bns meme read it
<JoJoe_Stinky> Iam Bi-polar and have a bit of schitsophrinia and agoreaphobia
-
Willy
Global Moderator
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:42 am
Fleischgeruch wrote:That's the rules, but I think that facet of the rules in regards to single player coalitions is kind of silly. If a general, like Buffalo in this instance, aims to divide and conquer an enemy and then, while he is weak, go for his main city (which is what's happening here) he'd likely have no interest in dividing his own forces from the main goal. I still think derpster should defend as a coalition, but I don't see why the attacker can't totally call the shots as to where to capture his territories, in regards to single-player coalitions.CommieBuffalo wrote:Attack the northern piece of derpsterI'm only going to say this one more time, aftet that people can complain all they want.
When a coalition fights, wins and losses are divided equally. Therefore you'll conquer on both sides. If you don't like it, shouldn't have split him.

komrades stole my lunch money

-
Zekamalikyd
Modder
- Posts: 4219
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:40 pm
good.
eat him out
liek i did wid ur mum last nait XDDDDDDD
eat him out
liek i did wid ur mum last nait XDDDDDDD
-
Zekamalikyd
Modder
- Posts: 4219
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:40 pm
Will wrote:flei is a faggot and refuses to fix loopholes mid-gameFleischgeruch wrote:That's the rules, but I think that facet of the rules in regards to single player coalitions is kind of silly. If a general, like Buffalo in this instance, aims to divide and conquer an enemy and then, while he is weak, go for his main city (which is what's happening here) he'd likely have no interest in dividing his own forces from the main goal. I still think derpster should defend as a coalition, but I don't see why the attacker can't totally call the shots as to where to capture his territories, in regards to single-player coalitions.CommieBuffalo wrote:Attack the northern piece of derpsterI'm only going to say this one more time, aftet that people can complain all they want.
When a coalition fights, wins and losses are divided equally. Therefore you'll conquer on both sides. If you don't like it, shouldn't have split him.
-
gen
Banned - Posts: 1016
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 4:04 pm
Zekamalikyd wrote:flei is a faggot and refuses to fix loopholes mid-gameagain
kmaj next risk op
south


<Lomasi> gen u are just a bored fat kid who thinks by harrasing others itll make himself feel better
AcethekingAoS wrote:I admit, i have no friends irl.
-
XxXAtlanXxX
Deuced Up - Posts: 557
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 12:26 am
-
Zekamalikyd
Modder
- Posts: 4219
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:40 pm
gen wrote:i thought we agreed we'd do itZekamalikyd wrote:flei is a faggot and refuses to fix loopholes mid-gameagain
kmaj next risk op
south
also flei,
zkt should have no capital now >:(
-
Fleischgeruch
Winter Celebration 2013
- Posts: 961
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:15 pm
-
Zekamalikyd wrote: flei is a faggot and refuses to fix loopholes mid-gameOk imagine I start editing each rule in the game while it's running. People who got accustomed to them and have made plans accordingly now have to do it all over again, and possibly will be disappointed at the changes as well (who knows, maybe someone actually doesn't mind them). I don't mind removing obvious loopholes and bad mechanics of the game but I do mind doing it while the round is running, without everybody's and I mean everybody's consent. I don't remember kmaj editing rules mid-game because someone didn't like them either.
Anyway this is not what this thread is for, you have a risk discussion thread buried somewhere.
Supprising. Funny. Intidimating.
Cool pastes | Cool pics
http://i.imgur.com/pg3BqWL.png new bns meme read it
<JoJoe_Stinky> Iam Bi-polar and have a bit of schitsophrinia and agoreaphobia
-
Willy
Global Moderator
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:42 am
Oh no he's definitely right in not changing the rules mid-game, I just think it's something we can alter for next game :)

komrades stole my lunch money

-
CommieBuffalo
Blue Master Race
- Posts: 2341
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:51 pm
Agreed with Will here. If I can't do that then, well, just attack derpster like normal.
why are you even reading this
-
Zekamalikyd
Modder
- Posts: 4219
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:40 pm
Fleischgeruch wrote:u wer suposd 2 b revlutiun lderZekamalikyd wrote: flei is a faggot and refuses to fix loopholes mid-gameOk imagine I start editing each rule in the game while it's running. People who got accustomed to them and have made plans accordingly now have to do it all over again, and possibly will be disappointed at the changes as well (who knows, maybe someone actually doesn't mind them). I don't mind removing obvious loopholes and bad mechanics of the game but I do mind doing it while the round is running, without everybody's and I mean everybody's consent. I don't remember kmaj editing rules mid-game because someone didn't like them either.
Anyway this is not what this thread is for, you have a risk discussion thread buried somewhere.
-
Fleischgeruch
Winter Celebration 2013
- Posts: 961
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:15 pm
-
Round 36. Players can now choose a special round bonus!

JEW rolls 7.
RBN attacks CUM.
RBN rolls 9. CUM rolls 6.
RBN wins and takes 5 territories from CUM. CUM has been destroyed.
BRO rolls 11.
GGE attacks NSP.
GGE rolls 9. NSP rolls 8 (coal.x2).
GGE wins and takes 9 territories from NSP. GGE receives 3 battle xp and NSP receives 1 battle xp.
ROD attacks RBN.
ROD rolls 9. RBN rolls 3.
ROD wins and takes 9 territories from RBN.
KKK expands via sea.
KKK rolls 10. Expansion successful.
KKK gains 9 territories.
ALD attacks DFL.
ALD rolls 5. DFL rolls 3.
ALD wins and takes 5 territories from DFL.
HBE attacks ZKT.
HBE rolls 7. ZKT rolls 8.
HBE wins and takes 7 territories from ZKT.
WTM rolls 3.

JEW rolls 7.
RBN attacks CUM.
RBN rolls 9. CUM rolls 6.
RBN wins and takes 5 territories from CUM. CUM has been destroyed.
BRO rolls 11.
GGE attacks NSP.
GGE rolls 9. NSP rolls 8 (coal.x2).
GGE wins and takes 9 territories from NSP. GGE receives 3 battle xp and NSP receives 1 battle xp.
ROD attacks RBN.
ROD rolls 9. RBN rolls 3.
ROD wins and takes 9 territories from RBN.
KKK expands via sea.
KKK rolls 10. Expansion successful.
KKK gains 9 territories.
ALD attacks DFL.
ALD rolls 5. DFL rolls 3.
ALD wins and takes 5 territories from DFL.
HBE attacks ZKT.
HBE rolls 7. ZKT rolls 8.
HBE wins and takes 7 territories from ZKT.
WTM rolls 3.
Supprising. Funny. Intidimating.
Cool pastes | Cool pics
http://i.imgur.com/pg3BqWL.png new bns meme read it
<JoJoe_Stinky> Iam Bi-polar and have a bit of schitsophrinia and agoreaphobia
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests






