Bf4 vs cod ghosts

[Vezok]

It still blows CoD out of the water. I played the campaign and it was epic. The multiplayer was also much more skill-oriented than any CoD ever.

[CommieBuffalo]

It still blows CoD out of the water. I played the campaign and it was epic. The multiplayer was also much more skill-oriented than any CoD ever.

Campaign was meh. Definitively better than BF3's, but it was way too short, I finished it in five hours.

[valkyriiking]

Most campaigns are short now compared to predecessors. Like how Vezok said, most companies focus more on the multiplayer... which is really sad. Campaigning is what hooked me onto games.

[Battlefire]

I was a Halo fan from day one. I liked Halo 4 because the way they finally added things from the books. The Didact, Librarian etc. Campaign was good for me. I still play it over and over again. Though it's pretty easy compare to Halo 2. Multiplayer is fun too, not as better than Halo 3 but still fun. Graphics...are amazing.

I don't know, I'm glad they added Commander Lasky. I like Sgt. Johnson but Lasky is just a better character for me. With is background and stuff. Also the commander of Infinity.

[pugglesthecow]

Always happy to see a game that incorporates the lore from the books and other sources in to it.

[Spidercooce]

Campaign means nothing. It's all about multiplayer, to which they did in fact slow down gameplay.

You didn't specify which category. So this poste is either invalid, or you were just too stupid/forgetful to not include the category you were referring to.

Quit covering your ass. No one plays CoD for the campaigns. The entire game revolves around multiplayer. Everyone knows this, and it should be rightly assumed.

I play CoD for campaign D;

[Zadix_]

I don't like the maps though. It just feels like it's BF3 but with customization and more destruction. Everything else seems the same. Plus I don't like the maps very much.

I don't know if you repeated the maps thing on purpose to emphasize it, but I agree. Maps are just a fishbowl. I can barely properly align the Attack Jets for a gun run.

I read something somewhere (can't remember anymore :l) that DICE was going to expand the fly zone for jets, but it might have just been a rumour.

[CommieBuffalo]

I don't like the maps though. It just feels like it's BF3 but with customization and more destruction. Everything else seems the same. Plus I don't like the maps very much.

I don't know if you repeated the maps thing on purpose to emphasize it, but I agree. Maps are just a fishbowl. I can barely properly align the Attack Jets for a gun run.

I read something somewhere (can't remember anymore :l) that DICE was going to expand the fly zone for jets, but it might have just been a rumour.

Oh fucking yes, they need to do it.

[awesomeness2000]

Cod ghost man, have been CoD sense it a WW2 game on the PC (AFTER MW3)

[CommieBuffalo]

Cod ghost man, have been CoD sense it a WW2 game on the PC (AFTER MW3)

...what?

[Arkger]

I don't like the maps though. It just feels like it's BF3 but with customization and more destruction. Everything else seems the same. Plus I don't like the maps very much.

Wait, have you actually played Bf4? The maps are pretty great. And in all honesty, I hate when people talk about it's maps when COD has recycled the same maps and added different textures, then call them new. Not only are Bf4 maps versatile (for all the game modes), but beautiful, and fun to play on (BESIDES FUCKING DAWNBREAKER I HATE DAWNBREAKER).

Bf4 Maps>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>COD "Maps"

And again, about it being 3.5, all Bf4 honestly does it improve upon bf3, and add more to the mix. Compared to Ghosts which steals a cutscene from an old game ._.

[CommieBuffalo]

I don't like the maps though. It just feels like it's BF3 but with customization and more destruction. Everything else seems the same. Plus I don't like the maps very much.

Wait, have you actually played Bf4? The maps are pretty great. And in all honesty, I hate when people talk about it's maps when COD has recycled the same maps and added different textures, then call them new. Not only are Bf4 maps versatile (for all the game modes), but beautiful, and fun to play on (BESIDES FUCKING DAWNBREAKER I HATE DAWNBREAKER).

Bf4 Maps>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>COD "Maps"

And again, about it being 3.5, all Bf4 honestly does it improve upon bf3, and add more to the mix. Compared to Ghosts which steals a cutscene from an old game ._.

Maps are shitty. They try to be a good play for all the gamemodes but they end up being mediocre at all of them. They should do more stuff like Damavand Peak. That map was a giant piece of turd for Conquest, but it was amazing for Rush.
Besides, they are so damn small. It is really hard to play with jets in them, it makes it hard to line up good gun runs in Attack Jets when all maps are the size of fish bowls.

[Arkger]

I don't like the maps though. It just feels like it's BF3 but with customization and more destruction. Everything else seems the same. Plus I don't like the maps very much.

Wait, have you actually played Bf4? The maps are pretty great. And in all honesty, I hate when people talk about it's maps when COD has recycled the same maps and added different textures, then call them new. Not only are Bf4 maps versatile (for all the game modes), but beautiful, and fun to play on (BESIDES FUCKING DAWNBREAKER I HATE DAWNBREAKER).

Bf4 Maps>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>COD "Maps"

And again, about it being 3.5, all Bf4 honestly does it improve upon bf3, and add more to the mix. Compared to Ghosts which steals a cutscene from an old game ._.

Maps are shitty. They try to be a good play for all the gamemodes but they end up being mediocre at all of them. They should do more stuff like Damavand Peak. That map was a giant piece of turd for Conquest, but it was amazing for Rush.
Besides, they are so damn small. It is really hard to play with jets in them, it makes it hard to line up good gun runs in Attack Jets when all maps are the size of fish bowls.

D: The maps are great to me...
About the mediocre thing I only play conquest and rush so I wouldn't know, but for those two most maps are great.
They are also allocating more space for the Jets I've heard.
Plus, if everyone gets 1 free DLC like Dice has hinted, you could just play air superiority :P

[CommieBuffalo]

D: The maps are great to me...
About the mediocre thing I only play conquest and rush so I wouldn't know, but for those two most maps are great.
They are also allocating more space for the Jets I've heard.
Plus, if everyone gets 1 free DLC like Dice has hinted, you could just play air superiority :P

Try some of the maps in Obliteration or Defuse. Some are just plain awful.
And I never heard about that extra air space thing, if they really are adding it, that'd be great.

[Arkger]

D: The maps are great to me...
About the mediocre thing I only play conquest and rush so I wouldn't know, but for those two most maps are great.
They are also allocating more space for the Jets I've heard.
Plus, if everyone gets 1 free DLC like Dice has hinted, you could just play air superiority :P

Try some of the maps in Obliteration or Defuse. Some are just plain awful.
And I never heard about that extra air space thing, if they really are adding it, that'd be great.

I tried obliteration on Paracel Storm, wasn't too bad. But I can't speak for every map though.

Bf4 is really fun though, now that I have it.
I played ghost with a friend, left a lot to be desired with the multiplayer, I dunno, just felt kind of stupid how fast you are, and how little recoil some guns have with recoil control. After 4 5 rounds, I quickly got tired, reminded me way too much of my bad experience with Mw3.