We have become what we hated the most
-
dragonfree97
Deuce - Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:36 pm
Unread post
by dragonfree97 » Sun Oct 20, 2013 1:46 pm
Alternatively you could talk about the topic at hand instead of whether someone's grammar isn't quite up to scratch
playing since Oct 2012
u: Park Bom, Selena Gomez, dragonfree97, kumi_netsuha, ghostpolitics
http://animalcrossing.wikia.com/wiki/User:Dragonfree97
-
Somnium
League Participant
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:06 am
Unread post
by Somnium » Sun Oct 20, 2013 1:59 pm
Lol point taken Dragon. I'm guilty of that. As well as he.

-
Somnium
League Participant
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:06 am
Unread post
by Somnium » Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:01 pm
ReubenMcHawk wrote:pretty colors!Somnium wrote:I could go through and pick apart this. But I'll let you live in ignorance and believe in some way shape or form won. And wont critisize every post even though I could. So revel in the blissfulness of your ignorance.You sound like you have some sort of superiority complex, so here's some advice: on the Internet, you're not better than anyone, and acting like it just makes you worse than them.
As for everyone else: nitpicking someone's grammar is the worst form of argument possible.
EDIT:Ninja_pig_pro wrote:Then you have to say what game your talking about dumbass.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry's_law

-
Somnium
League Participant
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:06 am
Unread post
by Somnium » Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:05 pm
dragonfree97 wrote:Looking down the server list all I see is a bunch of dead servers, 5 or 6 hosting Pinpoint/Hallway, a few arena/nuketown games and the odd AnticBridge. They're all awful maps, going against everything the game is supposed to be about. I've heard AoS described as a 'trench warfare simulator' - newsflash: trench warfare doesn't mean a great big gash through a pair of neon-coloured cliffs. Even the good CTF servers are now dead - Sw and Sham's rarely have more than 3 or 4 players on them if they're even on the list.Yeah I definately agree on this. I do enjoy playing hallway. But I don't enjoy playing every game on hallway or pinpoint or those type maps. Have you tried contacting a server host? It's possible that they might do this on a dead server. To test it out. It never hurts to ask. If you want I can contact aloha and ask. They're pretty reasonable.
The obvious solution is to either ban arena and awful/flatmaps from showing up in the list, or weight servers playing CTF, TC, TOW, etc. higher on the list, or weight servers playing maps which are actually decent to the top of the list, so the list doesn't look like Hallway/Hallway/HallwayForts/Pinpoint2/Hallway but more like Normandie/classicgen/pyspades/marketgarden/classicgen/mesa whatever.
In addition I'd argue that the burning-water is definitely a negative aspect of the game (except where it makes sense, like on Push gamemode, which imo is meh anyway) because you're removing an enormous amount of tactical advances that can be made on the enemy, and at the same time increasing the amount of 11-year-olds who enjoy being a 1337 sniper with their SMG in D4.
Island maps which you can't tunnel under e.g. pinpoint and island are equally bad - you remove another method of assault on the enemy, encouraging the fast-paced SMG combat on the level's surface where there's no chance you'll get any kills because the 12-year-olds rip up your sniper hole with their guns in seconds. When you've got waterburn on AND no tunneling, the game becomes a terrible experience - the only way the intel's getting out of either side is if the entirety of the opposing team logs off the game. Island with waterburn on is imo the absolute worst experience of the game. Water can be okay if it works - rivers work, an archipelago works (e.g. pyspades) but a symmetrical thin island in the centre of the map does not work and ends up being very boring.
Better maps are those which are deep, little to no peripheral water (i.e. not an island map), have small structures if any (there's a really good village map which Sw plays sometimes, I forget its name but it's called something like Battlefield 1941), have varied terrain (that random1231242352345 map is good for this, plains in the middle, forest to the south and mountains to the north, and despite the fact that it's an island, it's more than 60 blocks wide and it's not symmetrical so it's actually fun to play) with lots of height differences and places to hide and explore.
People in this thread have suggested that upping the player count to 64 would be the best idea, because you can't have 32 players per side when your map is less wide than that, as well as encouraging players to play on the larger maps because there will be more people and therefore it's quicker to walk until you get to the battlefield. On the other hand you've got lag concerns, but AoS from my experience isn't particularly demanding on the old network connection and if people connect to servers in their region there shouldn't be much of a problem (i.e. I have a terrible connection but my ping is usually sub 80 on Sw). Obviously there are bandwidth concerns from the other side of the connection, but on the other hand if it costs more to host a server you're probably going to get rid of a lot of the dead servers at the bottom of the list.
On the other hand perhaps a solution is to have a server hosted by BnS which has maps chosen by veteran players with modifications made to weapon stats (Sw does this very well) which is pinned to the top of the server list, as well as putting big notices all over the server list suggesting that players update to 0.76 in several languages (En, Fr, Sp, Pr, De, It and Po probably cover just about everyone) as well as a deadline date where the 0.76 list will become the default list.

-
ReubenMcHawk
Organizer
- Posts: 853
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:36 am
Unread post
by ReubenMcHawk » Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:30 pm
Somnium wrote:pretty colors!Sounds about right.
Come chat with the last good clan left! i.r0t.co #RoT
Videos | Logs | Logs censored by Pastebin
I'm better than you.

-
Somnium
League Participant
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:06 am
Unread post
by Somnium » Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:39 pm
Alright so on topic for this thread now. I know everyone well 90% of this community hates 1.0 the ptp version. The 10% being those few who do play 1.0. So the only thing I do like is the graphics. I know that it goes against what AOS is about meaning 0.75 and 0.76
But would you play it if. 1.0 had in fact kept the game play of say 0.75 and 0.76 and only changed the graphics to that of 1.0
yes I know they are separate. Yes I know that this is a rogue site. But if that this could happen what would you think?
But would you play it if. 1.0 had in fact kept the game play of say 0.75 and 0.76 and only changed the graphics to that of 1.0
yes I know they are separate. Yes I know that this is a rogue site. But if that this could happen what would you think?

-
gen
Banned - Posts: 1016
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 4:04 pm
Unread post
by gen » Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:54 pm
no because its called openspades and it eats my graphic card


<Lomasi> gen u are just a bored fat kid who thinks by harrasing others itll make himself feel better
AcethekingAoS wrote:I admit, i have no friends irl.
-
Somnium
League Participant
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:06 am
Unread post
by Somnium » Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:17 pm
gen wrote:no because its called openspades and it eats my graphic cardI meant more of an official thing. I take it "open spades" is a mod? I've seen "open spades" in the forums, as well as heard it mentioned, but haven't really looked into it. Does it require a large graphics card? Or is it still just in the early stages, requiring tune ups and bug fixes?
-Okay so I looked it up. That's not exactly what I was talking about. Although Open spades does look like it could be fun. I might have to try it out. I specifically like the cross hairs I think that is a good idea. What I was talking about is the graphics of 1.0 the ptp version. as in the same graphics. same skins for guns. and players. the 1.0 version looks to me like the blocks are almost rounded more. As well as the colors transition more evenly I think. In my opinion it looks better. Not to say that I don't like the current 0.75, 0.76 version but if there was a mod that altered the graphics of 0.75, 0.76 to look like 1.0 I think I'd try it out. And in the graphics area I mean more specifically of the entire thing. Not just terrain. Although I do like the way of the terrain. and the details that, they put in it. I have no idea if I'd enjoy it or anyone else would. But I would like to check it out.
Last edited by Somnium on Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.

-
AssadisLove
Deuce - Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:42 pm
Unread post
by AssadisLove » Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:26 pm
I have no interest in getting caught up in this argument but I will leave my own feedback. The only thing I can think of that will help the community is possibly advertising the game to audiences of games likes Red Orchestra, Arma, ect. I don't think anyone is going to actually want to play this game is pretty much on life support.
-
Somnium
League Participant
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:06 am
Unread post
by Somnium » Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:40 pm
AssadisLove wrote:I have no interest in getting caught up in this argument but I will leave my own feedback. The only thing I can think of that will help the community is possibly advertising the game to audiences of games likes Red Orchestra, Arma, ect. I don't think anyone is going to actually want to play this game is pretty much on life support.Hmm I advertise it to my friends. But that's about it. And most everything in advertising you have to pay for.
Social media is a possibility though. Such as Facebook and post the link spread it around really. And I'm not sure but the games you mentioned Might have Facebook pages or say there site. With their permission they may allow the community to create a short section on the page for other recommended games. I mean there's always options you just have to find them. And actually do it.

-
Ninja_pig_pro
Build and Shoot's 1st Birthday
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 1:24 pm
Unread post
by Ninja_pig_pro » Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:53 pm
On Topic - My Graphics Card Sucks and it can't run it.
Off Topic - This is the last one unless he posts another.
Off Topic - This is the last one unless he posts another.
Spoiler:
kill me
-
AssadisLove
Deuce - Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:42 pm
Unread post
by AssadisLove » Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:08 pm
Somnium wrote:By advertise I meant more along the lines of trying to introduce it their communities. I'm not really confident about it though.AssadisLove wrote:I have no interest in getting caught up in this argument but I will leave my own feedback. The only thing I can think of that will help the community is possibly advertising the game to audiences of games likes Red Orchestra, Arma, ect. I don't think anyone is going to actually want to play this game is pretty much on life support.Hmm I advertise it to my friends. But that's about it. And most everything in advertising you have to pay for.
Social media is a possibility though. Such as Facebook and post the link spread it around really. And I'm not sure but the games you mentioned Might have Facebook pages or say there site. With their permission they may allow the community to create a short section on the page for other recommended games. I mean there's always options you just have to find them. And actually do it.
-
Somnium
League Participant
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:06 am
Unread post
by Somnium » Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:11 pm
AssadisLove wrote:Hmm. By introducing it into their communities. Do you mean by oral or by visual. I know a lot of gaming sites. Allow Indie games and different games on side panels as advertising. I mean I realize that, this would cost money. Unless we where to convince the owners to allow it free of charge. But as far as oral. I'm pretty sceptical about that. I just don't see The community as a hole actually putting forth the effort. Besides, even if they did. The trick is getting them interested in the game, as well as convincing them to actually try the game. Even then, not all of them will like/enjoy the game as we do. So if I had to guess visual advertisement would most likely be the best path to follow.Somnium wrote:By advertise I meant more along the lines of trying to introduce it their communities. I'm not really confident about it though.AssadisLove wrote:I have no interest in getting caught up in this argument but I will leave my own feedback. The only thing I can think of that will help the community is possibly advertising the game to audiences of games likes Red Orchestra, Arma, ect. I don't think anyone is going to actually want to play this game is pretty much on life support.Hmm I advertise it to my friends. But that's about it. And most everything in advertising you have to pay for.
Social media is a possibility though. Such as Facebook and post the link spread it around really. And I'm not sure but the games you mentioned Might have Facebook pages or say there site. With their permission they may allow the community to create a short section on the page for other recommended games. I mean there's always options you just have to find them. And actually do it.

-
TheVetNoob
Build and Shoot's 1st Birthday
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:09 pm
-
Unread post
by TheVetNoob » Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:49 pm
(I have no idea what I'm talking about, but I'll just spew my idiocy around anyway, just like the rest of this thread)
Couldn't Jagex sue if we advertised? They still own the beta, and they would probably take any chance they could get to bring BnS down and force people to play 1.0
Couldn't Jagex sue if we advertised? They still own the beta, and they would probably take any chance they could get to bring BnS down and force people to play 1.0
-
Ninja_pig_pro
Build and Shoot's 1st Birthday
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 1:24 pm
Unread post
by Ninja_pig_pro » Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:29 pm
TheVetNoob wrote:(I have no idea what I'm talking about, but I'll just spew my idiocy around anyway, just like the rest of this thread)If they could sue I think they probably already have done it.
Couldn't Jagex sue if we advertised? They still own the beta, and they would probably take any chance they could get to bring BnS down and force people to play 1.0
kill me
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


