EldredChandler wrote:>Claims to know programming
>Doesn't know what a Fizzbuzz is
Dude come on, I don't code but even I know that.
>Knows a children's game
>Mocks someone who comes from a country where they don't have any equivalent, for not knowing it
Also, it's not like it's something that's region-based, it's used internationally.
How does that change the fact it is used in neither Denmark, nor Russia, nor any other country I've ever been to.
Also, that's quite a claim from someone from Pennsylvania.
VladVP wrote:Again, Wikipedia has never lied to me. And I just solved it.
Post the answer in Spoiler tags.
VladVP wrote:How does that change the fact it is used in neither Denmark, nor Russia, nor any other country I've ever been to.
Also, that's quite a claim from someone from Pennsylvania.
When you attempt to get a programming job, you'll get one. I know being 15 is hard, but give up.
mov eax, 0
mov ebx, 0
mov ecx, 0
:loop
inc eax
mov ebx, eax
mod ebx, 3
cmp ebx
iz fizz
mov ebx, eax
mod ebx, 5
cmp ebx
iz buzz
mov [results+ecx], eax
inc ecx
goto loop
:fizz
mov [results+ecx], 'f' ;whatever, you get it
inc ecx
goto loop
:buzz
mov [results+ecx], 'b'
inc ecx
goto loop
EldredChandler wrote:
VladVP wrote:How does that change the fact it is used in neither Denmark, nor Russia, nor any other country I've ever been to.
Also, that's quite a claim from someone from Pennsylvania.
When you attempt to get a programming job, you'll get one.
Well... I believe that's a compliment. Thank you very much then.
EldredChandler wrote:I know being 15 is hard, but give up.
Harder than you think. :C
But I don't think suicide will help me.
VladVP wrote:Well... I believe that's a compliment. Thank you very much then.
Pretty sure that was in reference to you being given a FizzBuzz problem, which you obviously cannot solve, so infact it was quite the opposite of a compliment. It was more of a statement pointing out how you wouldn't be able to get past the most rudimentary test.
VladVP wrote:How does that change the fact it is used in neither Denmark, nor Russia, nor any other country I've ever been to.
Poor excuse. Again, it's a standard. You'll learn that someday, maybe right around the time you actually learn to program.
It may be standard to a certain extent, but the name "Fizz Buzz", or it's use as a children's game has no equivalent anywhere outside the anglosphere, as far as I know.
StackOverflow wrote:
VladVP wrote:Again, Wikipedia has never lied to me. And I just solved it.
Google != solving
And what exactly makes you think that I used Google to find the answer?
VladVP wrote:Well... I believe that's a compliment. Thank you very much then.
Pretty sure that was in reference to you being given a FizzBuzz problem, which you obviously cannot solve, so infact it was quite the opposite of a compliment. It was more of a statement pointing out how you wouldn't be able to get past the most rudimentary test.
Then where did I fail with my attempt at solving it? Or am I supposed to make an entire analog circuit which generates a "FizzBuzz" sequence?
VladVP wrote:How does that change the fact it is used in neither Denmark, nor Russia, nor any other country I've ever been to.
Poor excuse. Again, it's a standard. You'll learn that someday, maybe right around the time you actually learn to program.
It may be standard to a certain extent, but the name "Fizz Buzz", or it's use as a children's game has no equivalent anywhere outside the anglosphere, as far as I know.
Wrong, yet again.
VladVP wrote:
StackOverflow wrote:
VladVP wrote:Again, Wikipedia has never lied to me. And I just solved it.
Google != solving
And what exactly makes you think that I used Google to find the answer?
Considering it's very apparent you haven't the faintest clue how to program.
VladVP wrote:It may be standard to a certain extent, but the name "Fizz Buzz", or it's use as a children's game has no equivalent anywhere outside the anglosphere, as far as I know.
For someone who wants to be a 'datalogist', you might want to learn basic programming.
