gun controll

[ZEB 99]

THAT'S HOW PRO GUN PEOPLE ARE HERE , I'm not saying bs, it's likely

[CommieBuffalo]

THAT'S HOW PRO GUN PEOPLE ARE HERE , I'm not saying bs, it's likely

That's 0.01% of pro-gun people. It wouldn't be a civil war, it would be a minor annoyance for the military to deal with.

[bloodfox]

Sure, But guns should not be encouraged. Because around 70% of people of America don't own a gun. And we should keep it that way.

[ZEB 99]

i think that statistic is a little off. search up how many americns own guns and you get ranges from thirty to sixty. its kinda hard to really tell just how many americns own guns

[bloodfox]

Yeah because what can we expect out of americans.

[CommieBuffalo]

Sure, But guns should not be encouraged. Because around 70% of people of America don't own a gun. And we should keep it that way.

Why not? Switzerland has a shitload of people owning guns and they don't seem to be a 24/7 anarchy. The problem is teaching people how to properly use guns instead of just giving them freely to every second redneck.
Also, can you please source me on that statistic? I've seen the number of gun-owning citizens vary wildly from 70% to 45% to fucking 5-10% depending on who you are quoting.

[Vezok]

THAT'S HOW PRO GUN PEOPLE ARE HERE , I'm not saying bs, it's likely

No, no it's not. Dude, I have lived in the midst of LA and in the rural midwest. And I can say with perfect seriousness that your so called "pro gun people" are an incredibly vocal minority (that also goes in hand with psychological implications on power, since people who do not have intellectual, social, or political power are the ones that resort to buying guns). A civil war would never break out.

Also, the Bundy ranch standoff convinced me that drone strikes on American soil is actually a good idea.

@Commie, yes there are a lot of factors involved in this, but there is a direct correlation to the legality of guns and homicide rates that point in favor of gun control. Because America's culture is so nationalistic that the only feasible option is to do so.

[ZEB 99]

even if they do get banned though, you know those guns, all that money people payed for them, people are not going to give up thousands of dollars worth of items just because guns get banned

[Vezok]

even if they do get banned though, you know those guns, all that money people payed for them, people are not going to give up thousands of dollars worth of items just because guns get banned

Because the government would definitely take away property like that without compensating them in any form. Seriously, think.
Besides, what would probably happen is they would stop the flow of new manufacturing for civilian use and make it a brutally slow process.

Anyhow, "gun control" isn't "ban all guns," as Republicans have yet to find out. In fact, one of the recent bills that was shot down tried to make suppressors illegal because of "omg teh govurmant is gerna take mah guns!"

[ZEB 99]

ok . why would you need a supressor at all. in nc it doesnt require a license to get one. tht making supressors illigaal i support

[bloodfox]

Sure, But guns should not be encouraged. Because around 70% of people of America don't own a gun. And we should keep it that way.

Why not? Switzerland has a shitload of people owning guns and they don't seem to be a 24/7 anarchy. The problem is teaching people how to properly use guns instead of just giving them freely to every second redneck.
Also, can you please source me on that statistic? I've seen the number of gun-owning citizens vary wildly from 70% to 45% to fucking 5-10% depending on who you are quoting.

I was winging it there. I was just doing an estimation. It doesn't kill you to do one right?

[Vezok]

ok . why would you need a supressor at all. in nc it doesnt require a license to get one. tht making supressors illigaal i support

Its stuff like that which is what tries to get passed, not some "ban all guns" crap that gets reported. So whenever you hear someone on the news talking about "gun control" its usually an attempt to ban holographic scopes or suppressors or ridiculously stupid stuff like that.

[[RUS] Vlad01]

Both are pretty backward

Give me proofs that Russia is a third world country

[Willy]

Both are pretty backward

Give me proofs that Russia is a third world country

I'm not entirely sure that's even what Fleischy was trying to say, but Russia is objectively not a third world country. Indeed, the entire notion of a 'first', 'second' or 'third'-world country is a piece of antiquated terminology left over from the Cold War. The United States and it's allies represented the 'First World', the Soviet Union, China and affiliated nations the 'Second World' and all other neutral, non-aligned nations were considered 'Third World'. Despite the connotations of poverty and new industrialisation (or total lack thereof) the term carries today, Switzerland (the 5th-8th richest country per capita, depending on who you ask) is officially a third world country.

[[RUS] Vlad01]

Both are pretty backward

Give me proofs that Russia is a third world country

I'm not entirely sure that's even what Fleischy was trying to say, but Russia is objectively not a third world country. Indeed, the entire notion of a 'first', 'second' or 'third'-world country is a piece of antiquated terminology left over from the Cold War. The United States and it's allies represented the 'First World', the Soviet Union, China and affiliated nations the 'Second World' and all other neutral, non-aligned nations were considered 'Third World'. Despite the connotations of poverty and new industrialisation (or total lack thereof) the term carries today, Switzerland (the 5th-8th richest country per capita, depending on who you ask) is officially a third world country.

I know what does this mean already, we're talking about quality of life