Build and Shoot

Hello once more, my fellow derps!

I have returned to bring you yet another pack of weapons that
have been edited slightly to make them more like their real
life counterparts.

This time we will be doing the FN Mark 16, and the FN Mark 17,
or Scar L, and Scar H for you CoD noobs... (Seriously though,
who plays CoD anymore anyway?!)

I personally like the black variant of the Mk16/17 better than
the sand colored ones, so there will be a poll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As always there are captions under the pictures, so make sure
you read them. (They are slightly helpful...)

First of all we have the MK16s.










And now for the MK17s.






That's all for today, let us know in the poll which
you think should happen.

Anyway, people who are saying of our weapons;
"It's cartoony and lame" It's Ace of Spades...
if you want realistic weapons find a different game.

Legitimate criticism is welcome, but don't complain about
cartoonishness, okay?

CYA IN A LITTLE WHILE DERPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh shoot I'm a retard...
I never posted a download link...
heh heh heh... uh, here you go.

MK16s...
http://www.mediafire.com/download/w4ab9 ... arL%29.zip

And MK17s...
http://www.mediafire.com/download/rniaz ... arH%29.zip

Sorry about that....

xCross wrote:

This guy sure has a lot of self confidence

If only he could translate that into skill for making skins.

xCross wrote:

This guy sure has a lot of self confidence

What is your issue, dude?

D&D Productions wrote:

xCross wrote:

This guy sure has a lot of self confidence

What is your issue, dude?

For your SCAR, the pistol grip and magazine should be curved out at the bottom, sights and grenade launchers look bad.

1Shot1Kill wrote:

xCross wrote:

This guy sure has a lot of self confidence

If only he could translate that into skill for making skins.

Are you guys dicks just to be dicks or is there a reason?

1Shot1Kill wrote:

D&D Productions wrote:

xCross wrote:

This guy sure has a lot of self confidence

What is your issue, dude?

For your SCAR, the pistol grip and magazine should be curved out at the bottom, sights and grenade launchers look bad.

Look at SkyNet's, hell, look at YOURS, the Mags aren't curved at the bottom, neither are the grips. Buzz off if all you are going to do is be rude or mean to no real avail.

Seriously guys, give these people (D&D Productions) a break. I mean, gosh, DON'T YOU FREAKING REALIZE THAT THE MAGAZINES ON THE FREAKING SCAR-H ARE STRAIGHT?!?!?! MY GOSH, FREAKING GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT BEFORE TRYING TO ARGUE WITH THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ok, now that I have gotten that point across, I would like to say this: GET IT INTO YOUR HEADS THAT THIS PERSON/PEOPLE IS TRYING TO MAKE SIMPLE, CARTOONY MODS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It clearly says so, right on the beginning of this post. Denying that is denying all rationality, and since rationality is the only difference between humans and animals, you are essentially denying your humanity and lowering yourself to the point of being an animal.

If you don't like D&D Productions' mods, get out. You don't have to be here, nobody is holding a gun to your head and saying, "READ THIS OR I WILL MAKE YOU SPIT GUM THROUGH YOUR FOREHEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!". And really, this person does not necessarily have a lot of self-confidence; I personally know many people who are just like that (goofy and making fun of themselves just for the sake of it).

1shot1kill, are you just a modding troll, or what? To quote Gunnery Sergeant Hartman from Full Metal Jacket, "I bet you're the kind of guy that would f*ck a person in the @$$ and not even have the godd*mn common courtesy to give him a reach-around". Really though, don't be so harsh on them. Are you envious? I believe you are, since a person's envy of somebody's skills leads that person to bash the second person until the second person is in a worse position than the first person, thereby allowing the first person to seem "oh so much" greater than the second person. Really, you might be a decent modder, but your social skills are bullsh*t.

1shot1kill

Thank you,
BOOM! Headshot.

D&D Productions wrote:

1Shot1Kill wrote:

D&D Productions wrote:

xCross wrote:

This guy sure has a lot of self confidence

What is your issue, dude?

For your SCAR, the pistol grip and magazine should be curved out at the bottom, sights and grenade launchers look bad.

Look at SkyNet's, hell, look at YOURS, the Mags aren't curved at the bottom, neither are the grips. Buzz off if all you are going to do is be rude or mean to no real avail.

What I ment is that the SCAR-L should be rounded off at the bottom, look at mine for example:

Just because your mods aren't the best doesn't mean it's rude, and if anything you are being more rude than me by trying to dismiss my criticism as "hate" and calling names on me.

BOOM! Headshot. wrote:

Seriously guys, give these people (D&D Productions) a break. I mean, gosh, DON'T YOU FREAKING REALIZE THAT THE MAGAZINES ON THE FREAKING SCAR-H ARE STRAIGHT?!?!?! MY GOSH, FREAKING GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT BEFORE TRYING TO ARGUE WITH THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ok, now that I have gotten that point across, I would like to say this: GET IT INTO YOUR HEADS THAT THIS PERSON/PEOPLE IS TRYING TO MAKE SIMPLE, CARTOONY MODS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It clearly says so, right on the beginning of this post. Denying that is denying all rationality, and since rationality is the only difference between humans and animals, you are essentially denying your humanity and lowering yourself to the point of being an animal.

If you don't like D&D Productions' mods, get out. You don't have to be here, nobody is holding a gun to your head and saying, "READ THIS OR I WILL MAKE YOU SPIT GUM THROUGH YOUR FOREHEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!". And really, this person does not necessarily have a lot of self-confidence; I personally know many people who are just like that (goofy and making fun of themselves just for the sake of it).

1shot1kill, are you just a modding troll, or what? To quote Gunnery Sergeant Hartman from Full Metal Jacket, "I bet you're the kind of guy that would f*ck a person in the @$$ and not even have the godd*mn common courtesy to give him a reach-around". Really though, don't be so harsh on them. Are you envious? I believe you are, since a person's envy of somebody's skills leads that person to bash the second person until the second person is in a worse position than the first person, thereby allowing the first person to seem "oh so much" greater than the second person. Really, you might be a decent modder, but your social skills are bullsh*t.

1shot1kill

Thank you,
BOOM! Headshot.

Oh, so you made an alternate account as well? There wouldn't be any other plausible reason why someone would post here defending you as their first ever post. And also, how do I envy someone who makes lots of bad looking mods and then tries to use "cartoony style" as an excuse? Just stop it with trying to insult me, all the name-calling and shit, it makes you look like a complete fool. Quit it with all of the emoticons too. Also, please note:

1Shot1Kill wrote:

Oh, so you made an alternate account as well? There wouldn't be any other plausible reason why someone would post here defending you as their first ever post.

Or someone could've been so upset they decided to make one...
I like them. I hate scars, but a small mag design flaw doesn't really matter much on AOS. If it looks cool to someone that's all that matters. You aren't "Rounding off" any voxels. The overall design and appeal of the gun is what people look at. Some may care about a small detail on the stock, but they are trying to create an issue where there is none.

And for the sake of emoticons, because apparently they are a bad thing:

If it really isn't clear enough for you, here's what I mean by rounding the bottom of the magazine off:

Mr.Torch wrote:

Or someone could've been so upset they decided to make one...

D&D Productions: Last visited: Wed Aug 13, 2014 2:40 am
BOOM! Headshot.: Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 2:53 am

Not to mention that he sounds awfully similar as well, right down to the obligatory emoticon.

1Shot1Kill wrote:

If it really isn't clear enough for you, here's what I mean by rounding the bottom of the magazine off:

Mr.Torch wrote:

Or someone could've been so upset they decided to make one...

D&D Productions: Last visited: Wed Aug 13, 2014 2:40 am
BOOM! Headshot.: Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 2:53 am

Not to mention that he sounds awfully similar as well, right down to the obligatory emoticon.

You moved two? three? pixels? Congrats. *Applauds* The world is a better place now that you are here to nitpick everything to imperfection. And people join the forums all the time. If you sincerely think he's multi-accounting just message an admin.

Mr.Torch wrote:

1Shot1Kill wrote:

If it really isn't clear enough for you, here's what I mean by rounding the bottom of the magazine off:

Mr.Torch wrote:

Or someone could've been so upset they decided to make one...

D&D Productions: Last visited: Wed Aug 13, 2014 2:40 am
BOOM! Headshot.: Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 2:53 am

Not to mention that he sounds awfully similar as well, right down to the obligatory emoticon.

You moved two? three? pixels? Congrats. *Applauds* The world is a better place now that you are here to nitpick everything to imperfection. And people join the forums all the time. If you sincerely think he's multi-accounting just message an admin.

The little things do count you know. There's a lot of other imperfections, like how the magazine is too far away from the pistol grip, lack of detail, how the rails look out of place, etc. True that people join this forum often, but can it really be a coincidence that someone makes an account about 10 mins after another person has logged off, and make a post defending him with a whole wall of text, sounding very similar to that person? I think not. And thanks for that tip.

Just a suggestion to D&D if he doesn't pass this off as being rude to him: Please keep all of your skins to one thread, not spamming them all over this subforum.

I took about 5 minutes to glance at your mod page. Please practice what you preach. I can tell you have never shot a real rifle with a real scope before.

A lot of your scopes contain one of the following imperfections:
1. Don't contain any adjustment knobs.
2. Contain only windage and no elevation knob.
3. Contain two windage and one elevation knob.

I do believe I saw only about 3 that were even right.

Also, your M16A3 looks horrendous. The real handguard does not bevel up enough for the bottom row of pixels to be removed. It looks like a lion came and bit a chunk out of it. Also, the real stock does not bevel out that much. They are quite flat and have only a slight bevel to the point where a pixel differentiation makes it look worse. Your iron sight has no adjustment knob again and/or is too low to make sense. Your receiver is way too wide for the mag size. Also, your forward bolt assist looks like a resting place for your fries. And finally, because I'm too lazy to nitpick anymore, you don't have a trigger and even if you did it's too far forward to be of use. Your trigger guard area should be closer to the pistol grip which is too far forward as well.

EDIT: This is just one gun, I can continue to move down the page if you wish.

Now now ladies take this discussion to your inboxes as it has gone towards another direction from giving feedback.