Page 1 of 1

0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:32 pm
by Mine7
Green_Stupid Blue_OffTopic

Re: 0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:59 pm
by Jdrew
Although I am bias for .75 as it was the first I played .76 really improved on alot of the bugs left off by .75 I just fell that .75 was a great era and you can't call yourself an AoS vet without playing it. I also played .7 remake but it seemed uncompleted. Each version suits different people as 1.0 is for battlefield/TF2/COD players and .75 is for people looking for something like AvA/TF2.

Re: 0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:18 am
by Sponge
Chose 0.76. 0.75 SMG is starting to get to me.

Re: 0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:27 am
by Vucgy
Sponge wrote:
Chose 0.76. 0.75 SMG is starting to get to me.
.76 the SMG is a bloodsucker it fu*king ruined the game in .76 its awesomly balanced cause of dmg-falloff

Re: 0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:16 am
by H@nkthet@nk
Yeah I will be honest, have not played .76 so I could not tell you. However, I think that .75 was good, minus the smg Blue_Pistol Green_Surprised2

Re: 0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 1:50 am
by Tank
Just been playing some 0.75 to about ~200 kills. I was doing decent getting around 9k/d ratio but the SMG and the inaccuracy on the rifle shines through to really annoy me as much as ever. So, as always, I'll be going with 0.76, it's pretty much a fixed 0.75, so it's simply going to be better.

Re: 0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:40 am
by White Hot
0.76 is indisputably better. That being said, 0.75 is more active, and therefore ends up being more fun to play.

Re: 0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:47 am
by MKU
jdrew wrote:
Although I am bias for .75 as it was the first I played .76 really improved on alot of the bugs left off by .75 I just fell that .75 was a great era and you can't call yourself an AoS vet without playing it. I also played .7 remake but it seemed uncompleted. Each version suits different people as 1.0 is for battlefield/TF2/COD players and .75 is for people looking for something like AvA/TF2.
In my opinion, an AoS veteran should be someone that was active on the bbpress forums... with that being said, being an AoS veteran, .76 is much better. .75 doesn't even compare.

Re: 0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 3:00 am
by Jdrew
MKU wrote:
jdrew wrote:
Although I am bias for .75 as it was the first I played .76 really improved on alot of the bugs left off by .75 I just fell that .75 was a great era and you can't call yourself an AoS vet without playing it. I also played .7 remake but it seemed uncompleted. Each version suits different people as 1.0 is for battlefield/TF2/COD players and .75 is for people looking for something like AvA/TF2.
In my opinion, an AoS veteran should be someone that was active on the bbpress forums... with that being said, being an AoS veteran, .76 is much better. .75 doesn't even compare.
.75 was so long though that if you were from about the late 2012 early 2012 then I think you can be a vet, but you are right true vets are from the bbpress forums.

Re: 0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:34 am
by TheGeekZeke101
jdrew wrote:
MKU wrote:
jdrew wrote:
Although I am bias for .75 as it was the first I played .76 really improved on alot of the bugs left off by .75 I just fell that .75 was a great era and you can't call yourself an AoS vet without playing it. I also played .7 remake but it seemed uncompleted. Each version suits different people as 1.0 is for battlefield/TF2/COD players and .75 is for people looking for something like AvA/TF2.
In my opinion, an AoS veteran should be someone that was active on the bbpress forums... with that being said, being an AoS veteran, .76 is much better. .75 doesn't even compare.
.75 was so long though that if you were from about the late 2012 early 2012 then I think you can be a vet, but you are right true vets are from the bbpress forums.
You obviously know little to nothing about the earlier stages of AoS, considering the earliest thing you've played is .7. I'm with MKU. I've been playing since .26 and barely consider myself a veteran. I think you have to have more knowledge and should have been around since the times of the bbpress forums and to take on such rank.

Personally I'm in the middle. I like .75, purely because I've had the chance to play it for a long time and "master" it. At the same time, .76 is a lot more improved and is a lot better when it comes to gun balancing. I'm not too much of a fan with the smg. It has changed way too much for me. It's also hard to time when I can take my next shot with the rifle. I think they both have their pros and cons and are separately pretty great.

Re: 0.75 vs 0.76

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:50 am
by Vucgy
The worst thing about this thread that its a copy of 2 - 3 other same named threads. And on all that 2-3 Threads .76 Was chosen by more then 90% of community but .75 stayed ... This is just talking about nothing , nothing will change like showed before...