Page 1 of 2
Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:15 pm
by Tek2
^title
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:34 pm
by ThisFrickinSite
By bad, do you mean badly designed, or low resolution? Because from most graphic designer's povs, low resolution graphics that look good are much better than high resolution that look real/average since designing on small canvases is such a larger hassle to get a good looking result. So, when I see bad, I read ugly. When I see simple, I read low work loads.
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 8:40 pm
by Sponge
Which Ace of Spades?
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 9:36 pm
by rakiru
As this is in the general section, I'd assume the voxlap version.
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:27 pm
by HoboHob
It's simple.
Bad means that the graphics suck.
And retro... AoS is definitely not 8 bit, heck or even 16 bit.
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:35 pm
by Heracles4
Awesome
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:02 am
by Sasquatch
Despite the fact that AoS is NOT 8 bit, it's always felt more retro to me than anything else.
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:22 am
by tallyyyyyy
I don't think it's really retro at all. More like simple graphics, definitely not bad.
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:53 pm
by Cajun Style
Definitely bad. Not horrible (it's clear). I don't really mind, though.
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:57 pm
by danhezee
I have always like simple abstract graphics over realism.
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:59 pm
by Priok
bad, but they're also pretty simple. I don't really like the shading methods in either versions of the game
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:39 pm
by Sonarpulse
As somebody who has looked at the inner workings of Voxlap, Ace of Spades graphics are fast, and perform equally on almost all computers as per thread speed is pretty much the same on all PC processors these days. This is why I like them, aesthetics is a secondary concern. Gameplay > graphics.
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:44 pm
by Jdrew
I have to side with dan, one of the things that made ace of spades so great was the fact that any computer can run it. That is then backed up by the graphics. But you can edit the graphics a bit with the cube.kv6

Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 12:41 am
by Articsledder
I honestly hated when ben started to shift over to 8bit style fonts and stuff, I always felt it was a gimmick when games rubbed there bad graphics in your face, it's not really something to strive for unless you are trying to emulate the 80's to mid 90's type games (which AoS wasn't)
Re: Ace of Spades graphics, bad, simple or "retro"?
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:41 am
by HoboHob
Articsledder wrote:I honestly hated when ben started to shift over to 8bit style fonts and stuff, I always felt it was a gimmick when games rubbed there bad graphics in your face, it's not really something to strive for unless you are trying to emulate the 80's to mid 90's type games (which AoS wasn't)
Aye, this.