Build and Shoot

yes i know that Battlefield 4 is out and some of you might just call me a F*ggot for bringing this up but hell, BF4 is the fricking same game as BF3 (great, now some fanboy is going to try to tell me the diffrences! LoL). i know this game is Terrible on its single player but battlefield wasn't really born a single player game, like AoS, it was born a multiplayer game called battlefield 1943, then Dice made a sequel, battlefield 2. battlefield 2 was to me one of the most amazing games because it combined the hotswap from lego and put it into a military game, which was pretty great at the time. then dice decided (the greatest decision of all time) to make the world of battlefield destructible in battlefield bad co, and its unnessesary sequel. then came my favorites BF3 and BF4, which ruined singleplayer and turned multiplayer into GOLD!

Some of you are wondering, what does this have to do with AoS? well AoS to me seemed like the son of BF 1943, and minecraft, mainly minecraft with guns because there is no "out of battlearea zones", and the only objective was to capture the intel. this free2play game was going to be Officially the son of battlefield UNTIL Jagex showed up, changed the crossover to TF2 and minecraft, and Messed it up Big time! thats why people founded BnS, but the closest thing that makes AoS amazingly better than AoS 1.0 without altering the gameplay, was openspades, but there was NO dropoff at all, making sniping too easy, no way to change your gun, and the game is about too laggy for low end computers like mine to do anything. This website makes AoS .76 the "Unofficial son of battlefield" OR the "Unofficial minecraft with guns". why am i saying Unoffical a lot, i don't know? If you're not interested in Battlefield, then why the hell are you reading this retard, go read about something else not Battlefield related!

The first game was battlefield 1942 not 1943, 1943 came later in the series. Ace of Spades never had vehicles and was never intended to go that way if I remember correctly. OpenSpades uses openGL 2.0(might be higher) so yes you will need something better then a toaster from 1999. You can also change your gun and team by pressing "l".

"This website makes AoS .76 the "Unofficial son of battlefield" OR the "Unofficial minecraft with guns""
That sentence doesn't even make sense

Overall I do not understand the purpose of the thread. If it was to tell us the history of BF then you did not do a good job as half of it is wrong. The second paragraph is unreadable.

Jdrew wrote:

The first game was battlefield 1942 not 1943, 1943 came later in the series. Ace of Spades never had vehicles and was never intended to go that way if I remember correctly. OpenSpades uses openGL 2.0(might be higher) so yes you will need something better then a toaster from 1999. You can also change your gun and team by pressing "l".

"This website makes AoS .76 the "Unofficial son of battlefield" OR the "Unofficial minecraft with guns""
That sentence doesn't even make sense

Overall I do not understand the purpose of the thread. If it was to tell us the history of BF then you did not do a good job as half of it is wrong. The second paragraph is unreadable.

im sorry about that, first BF game i played was BF 1943, it was mainly the only BF game that took place in '40s on the xbox live arcade.

"you can change you're gun with 'l'"
thanks

"Ace of spades never had vehicles and never intended to go that way"
thats why i said it was more like minecraft with guns, because Aos was openworld, kind of, and it didn't have vehicles. same with minecraft.

Battlefield Bad Company 2 was the best imo. Battlefield 3 was not bad, but they messed up the game balance by making the assault a medic thus making it the best class. Just think about it, the most versatile weapons + the ability to heal and revive players. Battlefield 4 is buggy as hell and crashes a lot. The netcode is shitty. Rush is also fucked up, they just took the conquest map and just added a few mcoms. Its almost impossible to get past the first 2 mcoms.All together, BF4 seems like a rushed game that should have been released 6 months later.

1.BFBC2
2.BFBC
3.BF3
4.BF4

I don't get how AoS is BF's "almost official son". You could be just as well saying that about any other shooter. The only similarity between the 2 games is the fact that both of them are fps games.

Ballistic wrote:

1.BFBC2
2.BFBC
3.BF3
4.BF4

You got the list right.

This is completely your opinion.

What my good side is saying:
This hasn't got anything to do with battlefield, multiplayer is barely like it, they're set in different times, and the single player of BF3 and BF4 weren't bad, they were pretty good.

My bad side:

i make bullets' words my own

Battlefield 3's story was pretty damn shitty, the very embodiement of the stereotypical FPS shooter, but I quite enjoyed BF4's, my main problem with it is that it is way too short. I'd love to see what happened inbetween the prison escape and them reaching Old Town.
IMO, Battlefield 4 basically builds up on what Battlefield 3 was, improving some bad things and adding some nice stuff too. If they would just clean out all the bugs and glitches and crashes and headglitching, then it would be a pretty damn great game, but it still manages to be a pretty fun game.
They also need to make the maps designed specifically for certain gamemodes, because in trying to be good at every gamemode they end up being mediocre at everything. Rush is a clusterfuck in BF4 because they basically take the Conquest map and slap some MCOMMs here and there. If I recall correctly, some maps in the Bad Company series were only for a single gamemode, like Conquest or Rush.

BF3 singleplayer was stupid. It was boring and very short. I totally prefer CoD's singleplaye way more.

Battlefire wrote:

BF3 singleplayer was stupid. It was boring and very short. I totally prefer CoD's singleplaye way more.

same here, I loved the campaign of the Modern Warfare series

MW 1 & 2 were fun

CommieBuffalo wrote:

Battlefield 3's story was pretty damn shitty, the very embodiement of the stereotypical FPS shooter, but I quite enjoyed BF4's, my main problem with it is that it is way too short. I'd love to see what happened inbetween the prison escape and them reaching Old Town.
IMO, Battlefield 4 basically builds up on what Battlefield 3 was, improving some bad things and adding some nice stuff too. If they would just clean out all the bugs and glitches and crashes and headglitching, then it would be a pretty damn great game, but it still manages to be a pretty fun game.
They also need to make the maps designed specifically for certain gamemodes, because in trying to be good at every gamemode they end up being mediocre at everything. Rush is a clusterfuck in BF4 because they basically take the Conquest map and slap some MCOMMs here and there. If I recall correctly, some maps in the Bad Company series were only for a single gamemode, like Conquest or Rush.

dude, last time i checked the reviews, people said bf4 multiplayer was Fricken glithchy as hell man. i even saw a video, if you lag when a heli crashes, it freezes and stays there, in air or land.

awesomeness2000 wrote:

CommieBuffalo wrote:

Battlefield 3's story was pretty damn shitty, the very embodiement of the stereotypical FPS shooter, but I quite enjoyed BF4's, my main problem with it is that it is way too short. I'd love to see what happened inbetween the prison escape and them reaching Old Town.
IMO, Battlefield 4 basically builds up on what Battlefield 3 was, improving some bad things and adding some nice stuff too. If they would just clean out all the bugs and glitches and crashes and headglitching, then it would be a pretty damn great game, but it still manages to be a pretty fun game.
They also need to make the maps designed specifically for certain gamemodes, because in trying to be good at every gamemode they end up being mediocre at everything. Rush is a clusterfuck in BF4 because they basically take the Conquest map and slap some MCOMMs here and there. If I recall correctly, some maps in the Bad Company series were only for a single gamemode, like Conquest or Rush.

dude, last time i checked the reviews, people said bf4 multiplayer was Fricken glithchy as hell man. i even saw a video, if you lag when a heli crashes, it freezes and stays there, in air or land.

That's not even the problem, the matter of fact is that in current gen consoles and maybe on PC you can't go 3 matches without the game crashing.

People's thoughts are bouncing all over the place, this thread is really hard to read.

Also, the only battlefield I really liked was 2142.

Ballistic wrote:

Battlefire wrote:

BF3 singleplayer was stupid. It was boring and very short. I totally prefer CoD's singleplaye way more.

same here, I loved the campaign of the Modern Warfare series

Loved the MW's story. I have hate the mutiplayer of CoD after MW2. But campaign was good.